If I was to consider myself an: Idolator/Infidel, a Goyim or an Oxygen thief, who would be my greater enemy?
Will humanity realise who their enemy is? Will they have the ability to find out, when free-speech to debate contentious topics is removed?
Now that I have your attention let’s look at being an Idolator/Infidel under Islam first.
Islam makes some strong claims about Christians, Jews and Atheists, in their writings.
Here is a small sample.
The above was sourced from an article at Center for Inquiry originally written a couple of years after 9/11: A Call to the Muslims of the World, From Freethinkers and Humanists of Muslim Origins.
“Culturally we are still Muslims, but we no longer believe in Islam as the true religion of God. We are humanists. We love humanity. We work for the unity of humankind.”
- https://centerforinquiry.org/blog/a-call-to-the-muslims-of-the-world/
Israels strong response to the brutal slaughter on the 7th of October has emboldened this Hamas leader who pulls no punches on his view to kill every Jew on the planet.
Surely this would be the view of only a very small % of those practicing Islam, right?
Source (Twitter)
But what of the Jewish religion and the Jewish Rabbis and scholars who appear to also have strong feelings about non-Jews (Goyim)
This from 2010
Source (DomDocuments - Bitchute)
To be fair though, according to Jewish Telegraphic Agency (JTA) Rabbi Ovadia Yosef was condemned for his comments.
"Rabbi Yosef’s remarks — suggesting outrageously that Jewish scripture asserts non-Jews exist to serve Jews — are abhorrent and an offense to human dignity and human equality,” said AJC Executive Director David Harris.” October 18, 2010
https://www.jta.org/2010/10/18/israel/sephardi-leader-yosef-non-jews-exist-to-serve-jews
Let’s explore being labelled a Goyim a bit further.
Is “Goy” a slur? Andrew Silow-Carroll unpacks it in another JTA article.
“Ophir and Rozen-Zvi also suggest that the Us and Them thinking of the rabbis tends to reinforce a sense of superiority among the Jews, and assigns to goyim qualities that, as Baker writes, “mark their lack of worthiness – and … none that are genuinely positive.”
At the very least, the idea of undifferentiated goyim shows an incredible lack of curiosity of the ways that non-Jews might differ among themselves, let alone how they differ from Jews.”
So, should we just ignore all Rabbis and Jewish scholar’s comments?
What is one supposed to make of such claims as the ones in this clip?
Surely this would be the view of only a very small % of Jews, right?
Source (DomDocuments - Bitchute)
But what of those who believe I’m and oxygen thief?
Here is key Club of Rome member, Dennis Meadows, who believes the planet can only sustain 1 billion people but he hopes the reduction can occur in a “civil way”.
(Source - We Love Earth - YouTube)
Unfortunately, Dennis’s views are also shared by many of the planets ultra wealthy and powerful globalists often referred to as the 1% who aim to be much more radical than Dennis surmises. Clearly Nations haven’t been working hard enough on population control, so:
Is #ClimateScam their plan?
Is fueling #globalconflict for country v country and #CIVILWAR part of the plan?
Are medical #countermeasures part of the plan?
Are environmental attacks like #WeatherModification part of the plan?
Some of the 1% have shown their hand during COVID, which you can research yourself, I suggest a search on X or browsers other than Google.
You could try searching:
#ExitTheWho #ExitTheUn #ExitTheWEF #ExitMrGlobal #NoNewWorldOrder #NoOneWorldGovernment #BuildBackBetter #GreatReset #depopulationists #YouWillOwnNothingandBeHappy #NWOAgenda2030 #CrimesAgainstHumanity
However Dr Robert Malone details it pretty well here:
So, who do I believe is a greater threat?
As much as it concerns me that an unknown number (I believe a small percentage) of fundamentalist Islamists and Jews reference disdain, subjugation and even death for non-Islamists and non-Jews (Infidels/Goyim).
I believe that the 1% club are the greater enemy and may in fact be controlling the division of the first two as well as other crisis surrounding religious persecution to create global instability.
“When you ignore discrimination, you should not be surprised when it morphs into persecution; when you ignore that, atrocities, crimes against humanity and even genocide will be waiting in the wings.”
https://www.gisreportsonline.com/r/global-crisis-religious-persecution/
I also strongly believe the 1% club don’t care about someone’s religion, world view, race, colour, gender, or political view.
Their whole goal is wealth, power, and control over the remaining slaves after their planed global culling, hinted at by Dennis Meadows above.
The UN and its member nations have had 78 years to get it right regarding world peace. Have they got it right?
Is the UN also controlled by the 1% club? It would certainly explain humanities division and overall global instability.
So, what do we make of the Charter of the United Nations and the Declaration of Human Rights?
Article 1
The Purposes of the United Nations are:
1. To maintain international peace and security, and to that end: to take effective collective measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace, and for the suppression of acts of aggression or other breaches of the peace, and to bring about by peaceful means, and in conformity with the principles of justice and international law, adjustment or settlement of international disputes or situations which might lead to a breach of the peace;
2. To develop friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, and to take other appropriate measures to strengthen universal peace;
3. To achieve international cooperation in solving international problems of an economic, social, cultural, or humanitarian character, and in promoting and encouraging respect for human rights and for fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language, or religion; and
4. To be a center for harmonizing the actions of nations in the attainment of these common ends.
A UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
Article 1
All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Universal_Declaration_of_Human_Rights
I believe the remainder of humanity, the 99%, need to decide if they will work together for the whole of humanity to expose and push back on the 1% to avoid the proposed extermination and a non-human future as detailed by one of their mouthpieces here.
(Source - REDPILL42 - YouTube)
As a Christian, I fully acknowledge the existence of the great dragon lucifer the devil, who was banished to the earth and is now enacting his wrath upon Gods creation with the hope to drag as many souls as possible with him to his demise.
And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever. (Revelations 20:10)
I believe lucifer is the influence behind the 1% club who straddle the fence of secularism and religion to create division and fear among all of humanity, and this includes Christians.
The 1% club have done this so easily and well with their wealth and power, which they have used to capture and control many global corporations including the mainstream media networks.
This is why it’s absolutely imperative to push back on any censorship and draconian Mis / Dis information legislation, so access to platforms with strong free speech models like X, Rumble and Bitchute are not restricted into the future.
Sure, there’s going to be controversial content on these platforms, but information must be accessible for humanity to hold the 1% who want to control the narrative and information flow for global control to account.
What are we to think of the EU’s move here, just like the UN, are they captured?
The EU has opened infringement proceedings into X, previously known as Twitter, over suspected failure to combat content disinformation and manipulation.
The bloc’s regulator Thierry Breton said that the move is in response to suspected breaches of X’s transparency obligations and its duties to counter illegal content and disinformation.
The Digital Services Act requires large online platforms such as X to mitigate the risk of disinformation and institute rigorous procedures to remove hate speech, while balancing this with freedom-of-expression concerns.
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/12/18/eu-opens-infringement-proceedings-against-musks-x.html
I do not wish for the death or subjugation of anyone, especially by deception, coercion, or force as the 1% have planned, and we must vehemently push back against a coordinated global attack on free speech and information flow.
Regardless, I believe that ultimately “God’s Will be Done”, and I pray for a willing acceptance of Yeshua by as many as possible.
Acknowledging “His will be done” without works is not enough though.
In order to be truly free we will need to continue to push back on the dragon, his demons, and minions within our individual and/or collective capacity.
Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage. (Galatians 5:1)
Amen.
Mark.