Email to the Premier of South Australia, Minister for Health & Wellbeing, and Chief Public Health Officer - 08/02/2024
SA Health Policy and SA legal win for compensation
SA Health Policy and SA legal win for compensation
From: erich.neug <erich.neug@protonmail.com>
To: Premier@sa.gov.au, Health:Minister for Health<ministerforhealth@sa.gov.au>, nicola.spurrier@flinders.edu.au, public.health@sa.gov.au
CC: Politicians, Bureaucrats, Media, Lawyers
Date: Thursday, February 8th, 2024 at 11:01 PM
To:
The Hon Peter Malinauskas MP - Premier of South Australia
Chris Picton MP - Minister for Health and Wellbeing
Prof Nicola Spurrier - Chief Public Health Officer for the State of South Australia
Regarding: SA Health Policy and SA legal win for compensation
As with all my correspondence to you, this one is also publicly available.
Peter, Chris, and Nicola, well here we are, 3 years of correspondence about harms associated with the mandated COVID 19 countermeasures and the Legal system is finally catching up.
But before we get to some important legal news.
Chris, I thank you for your email on December 19, 2023 containing a letter (attached) responding to my email dated November 21, 2023.
In it you mention –
“Following broad consultation and extensive feedback from SA Health workers, unions and businesses, SA Health has introduced an updated workplace vaccine policy for its own workforce, which applies to all SA Health services.”
My question about this is, were SA Health Workers, unions and business owners fully briefed on the latest evidence regarding COVID 19 “Vaccine” harms prior to the updated workplace vaccine policy?
You also mention –
“The Addressing Vaccine Preventable Disease: Occupational Assessment, Screening and Vaccination Policy (the Policy) provides clarity on vaccine requirements for SA Health staff. It classifies employees according to their risk factors and direct contact with patients.”
From the Policy:
This Policy provides requirements for:
• the assessment, screening and vaccination to protect against specified vaccine preventable diseases (VPDs) and;
• assessment and screening of tuberculosis (TB)
So, Chris, the big question is, does the COVID 19 “Vaccine” prevent the disease? The global evidence would suggest it does not, but much worse than that, and maybe you should discuss these FACTS with Nicola.
Will you now review the inclusion of the COVID19 Countermeasures in the above policy, and bring much needed Health Professionals who chose not to receive them back to work to help in South Australia’s haemorrhaging Health system?
But now to a recent legal development here in South Australia (Shepherd v The State of South Australia (in right of the Department for Child Protection) [2024] SAET 2 (15 January 2024))
Where The Department of Child Protection (DCP) must pay compensation and medical expenses to a youth worker who developed pericarditis after getting a Covid booster under a workplace vaccination directive, the South Australian Employment Tribunal has ruled, which was covered by investigative journalist Rebekah Barnett here.
Rebekha also managed to get his story here.
The South Australian ruling as well as a significant NSW ruling is covered by Human Right Lawyer Peter Fam in this video presentation to help people understand the outcome of the rulings.
Nicola, as Chief Public Health Officer for our state and involved in regular national briefings it’s quite ironic and unfortunate that the South Australian case involves the Department of Child Protection, which I have been writing to you and many others about for over 2 years under my obligations as a mandated notifier concerning the encouragement and bribery of children in care by the DCP based on your advice for them to receive the COVID 19 countermeasures, which they never required. I’d love to see you facilitate an open debate with Judy Wilyman, as she would have much to share with you about her decades long work, but here is her recent article to give you a starting point for any future discussions.
So, I’m confident in surmising that neither you, Chris or Peter would be in a hurry to support a full Royal Commission, as being called for by at least some brave politicians, into the COVID 19 response including mandates.
I know I’ve shared testimony from barrister Julian Gillespie before, but here is his latest, which is from the full COVID Royal Commission Terms of Reference Inquiry, here.
Peter, as Premier of South Australia, will you have the courage to fully support the call to have a Full Royal Commission with broad terms of reference to investigate the response to COVID and associated mandated countermeasures? After all, it would be good to get some more investigation into the destruction of informed consent in Australia as Elizabeth Hart details in this recent article. You’d be familiar with Elizabeth’s work as she’s written to you on numerous occasions as well.
Peter, Chris and Nicola, in light of the injury sustained by Mr Shepherd as a result of the Covid 19 “Vaccine” it is timely for me to remind you of my questions regarding children under the Guardianship of the Minister for Child Protection from my February 2023 correspondence to Minister Hildyard, which a full Royal Commission may have the scope to investigate further under its terms of reference.
1. As I have been made aware this occurred, will you investigate if any child under the guardianship of the Minister for Child Protection was strongly encouraged, bribed, or coerced to receive any dose of the COVID-19 Vaccine and report the findings?
2. Were all children under the guardianship of the Minister for Child Protection made fully aware of all the possible adverse events associated with the approved COVID-19 Vaccines, prior to them being administered?
3. Were all carers/guardians for children under the guardianship of the Minister for Child Protection made fully aware of all the possible adverse events associated with the approved COVID-19 Vaccines, prior to them being administered to the children under their care?
4. Does the Department for Child Protection (DCP) have a full and comprehensive readily accessible records of all children under the guardianship of the Minister who have received one or more doses of COVID-19 Vaccines?
5. Does this readily available record have information relating to the Vaccine product received, the batch and on what date/s?
6. As the DCP have been alerted by me since October 2021, about concerns surrounding safety of the COVID-19 vaccines, has the DCP put in place any ongoing health monitoring mechanisms for all children under the guardianship of the Minister who have received the COVID-19 Vaccine/s?
7. Does the DCP maintain records for any child under the guardianship of the Minister who has received a COVID-19 Vaccine and HAS had an adverse event, ongoing health concerns or has died after receiving a COVID-19 Vaccine?
8. What mechanisms are in place for the DCP to keep long term records for all children under the guardianship of the Minister who have received the COVID-19 vaccine/s for likely future reparations?
9. Has the DCP considered that a fund may need to be set up to cover the cost of future reparations, considering the mounting evidence of what’s currently known about the safety concerns of the COVID-19 vaccines, and the lack of long-term safety data available as per traditional immunisation products?
South Australian’s deserve to have many more than these questions answered about the overall handling of COVID 19, and I certainly hope that a Full Royal Commission with broad terms of reference is afforded to not only South Australians, but all Australian’s, in order to get closure over one of the most tyrannical responses to a national event for our times.
Mark Neugebauer
South Australian concerned about the overreach of Government and unelected Globalists.