A New Year and still no response from Australias criminally complicit politicians and bureaucrats.
No response to an April 2023 letter, but I resolve to continue to hound them into 2024
Re: – The evidence for serious long-term harm, death and lack efficacy off the COVID-19 Vaccines is now overwhelming, and ignorance may no longer be a defence!
From: erich.neug erich.neug@protonmail.com
To: minister.butler@health.gov.au, enquiries@health.gov.au
CC: john.skerritt@health.gov.au, heysen@parliament.sa.gov.au, curran.office@parliament.sa.gov.au, 'Jennifer Squires'<jsquires@tntradio.live>, avi@rebelnews.com, black@parliament.sa.gov.au, editor@yrn.com.au, enquiry@epochtimes.com.au, Health:Minister for Health<ministerforhealth@sa.gov.au>, matt.welch@victorharbortimes.com.au, Premier@sa.gov.au, rowan.dean@bigpond.com, schubert@parliament.sa.gov.au, sophie.conlon@victorharbortimes.com.au, tiser@theadvertiser.com.au, Tony Nikolic<tony@aflsolicitors.com.au>, Rennick, Gerard (Senator)<Senator.Rennick@aph.gov.au>, senator.antic@aph.gov.au, Roberts, Malcolm (Senator)<Senator.Roberts@aph.gov.au>, Game, Jennifer (Sen P. Hanson)<jennifer.game@aph.gov.au>, game.office@parliament.sa.gov.au, Babet Ralph (Senator Office)<senator.babet@aph.gov.au>, elisa@courier.net.au, editor@spectator.com.au, Minister.Hildyard@sa.gov.auDateThursday,
April 6th, 2023 at 9:33 PM
April 6th, 2023
To
Brendan Murphy
Secretary of the Department of Health
Australian Government
Mark Butler
Minister for Health and Aged Care
Australian Government
Re: – The evidence for serious long-term harm, death and lack efficacy off the COVID-19 Vaccines is now overwhelming, and ignorance may no longer be a defence!
Brendan and Mark,
I write to you today in my continued attempt to have the COVID-19 Vaccines (AKA – Countermeasures from here on in) for the virus known as COVID-19 removed from the Australian market for the entire population, but of most importance to me, for children.
Over the past two years I have written to numerous politicians, bureaucrats and corporations regarding my concerns over the safety and efficacy as well as the mandating of these Countermeasures. These letters can be found here, they are all publicly available, as will this correspondence be.
In my most recent correspondence you will note I wrote to the Minister for Child Protection in my State of South Australia, titled – Ongoing emerging information and data regarding COVID-19 Vaccine harm in children.
In this correspondence I referenced a very thorough and articulate letter addressed to you from the Australian Medical Professionals Society (AMPS) titled – Evidence for reasons to discontinue COVID-19 vaccines for Infants through 4 years; need for action by the Department of Health
The letter is damning in itself, but another very concerning issue for children is that the evidence showing concerns over bio distribution to the ovaries, testes and placenta keeps building, and as well as noted in the AMPS letter, I’ve supplied some more information for you HERE HERE and HERE.
The World Council for Health are also raising concerns HERE
Obviously, this is very concerning for all those individuals affected now, but what about all the children who were made to take these Countermeasures? Will there be future Infertility, future Birth defects, another future wave of children born with lifelong disabilities?
The current answer is, no one truly knows because there are no long term safety studies or data, but from what we now know, it is HIGHLY likely many children could have lifelong health issues, be infertile, give birth to children with fatal birth defects, as well as give birth to children with lifelong disabilities.
So, is it any wonder why I’m so infuriated that children in State care were made to have these countermeasures In the first place, but as with all my correspondence to my State Department for Health and Department for Child Protection, the response is similar:
“Please be advised that the framework for the administration of vaccines is set by the Commonwealth and the Therapeutic Goods Administration.” - Chris Picton, Minister for Health and Wellbeing South Australia (Letter to Mr Neugebauer PDF)
“As previously advised, our department’s decision-making and response in relation to
the pandemic continues to be guided by federal and state government health authorities. We therefore recommend you direct any concerns regarding COVID-19 and the advice of health authorities, or any further enquiries, to SA Health by emailing HealthCE@sa.gov.au.” - Sue Macdonald EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR SERVICE DELIVERY AND PRACTICE (F2023003077 – Correspondence from the Department for Child Protection.pdf) Attached below
So, Brendan and Mark, seeing all of my concerns raised as a mandated notifier to my State authorities regarding the safety of COVID-19 Countermeasures are null and void, which is a direct result of your departments approval and advice, the buck stops with YOU.
Here is a reminder of my obligations:
“A mandated notifier is required by law to notify the Department for Child Protection if they suspect on reasonable grounds that a child or young person is, or may be, at risk of harm”
“This obligation arises when a mandated notifier forms this suspicion in the course of their employment (whether paid or voluntary).”
It is at this point I now advise you that even though I have not been supported in my mission to protect children from ongoing harm from the Countermeasures by my State Government Departments, or even the Federal and High Court due to my not having “Standing” (let's see where this High Court case leads), I will continue to pursue any individual responsible for continuing to approve and push these Countermeasures into our population, least of all children.
With ever mounting discussions of evidence for the serious harms as a result of the COVID-19 virus response, COVID-19 Countermeasures as well as the restriction of early treatment protocols to the Australian public, a valid question would be, will it amount to individuals being found guilty of malfeasance in public office, or worse, the possibility of involuntary manslaughter?
Manslaughter by criminal negligence is also where there is no intent to kill.
It is a conscious act which entails such reckless disregard of the standard of care and high risk of injury that it merits criminal punishment.
To establish the offence of involuntary manslaughter by criminal negligence, the prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt that:
1. The defendant owed a legal duty of care to the deceased,
2. The defendant committed an act or omitted to do an act,
3. The act or omission substantially caused or accelerated the death of the deceased,
4. The act or omission breached the duty of care owed to the deceased, and
5. The act or omission amounted to criminal negligence and deserved criminal punishment for the offence of manslaughter because:
· it fell far short of the standard of care which a reasonable person would have exercised in the circumstances; and
· involved such a high risk that death or really serious bodily harm would follow as a result of it.
Only time will tell if serious legal action is forthcoming, but I will certainly not relent in seeking justice for those, particularly children who have already died, been seriously injured, or have lifelong poor health outcomes as a result of being coerced, bribed and forced to take these Countermeasures.
So, the question I will conclude with now for you both, Brendan, and Mark, is:
“With the overwhelming global evidence of serious harm and death attributed to the COVID-19 Countermeasures, will you now bring to a complete STOP the roll out of all of the COVID-19 Countermeasures and remove them from the Australian market?”
Mark Neugebauer